• LinkedIn
Telefono: 02 36 52 29 61 | info@studio-pandolfini.it
Franchising in Italy
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • THE ITALIAN ENVIRONMENT
  • SERVICES
  • RESOURCES
    • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT US
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
exclusive rights in italian franchising agreements

Franchising: defining exclusive territory rights

19 February 2021/in Franchising

Under an exclusivity clause, franchisors cannot  enter into other franchise contracts within a certain area, described in the franchise agreement. Exclusive territories are quite common in franchise agreements in Italy, since they avoid franchisees from the same network competing with each other, and provide them  with a secure slice of the market. An exclusive territory can be defined by a number of methods. Choosing the size and location of each franchisee’s territory can be challenging, since a franchise system can be damaged by awarding too many franchises in one area or too few. Many franchise networks aim to keep each territory the same, for uniformity needs; however, this needs careful consideration, since the Italian territory is very different. Often franchisors reserve the right to distribute products through “alternative channels of distribution within franchisees exclusive territory. Moreover, franchisors usually wish to retain some flexibility in awarding exclusive territories to franchisees, therefore providing for the right to modify the exclusivity clause during the franchise agreement. Franchise agreements usually contain a regulation or a procedure to deal with situations where a franchisee receives an enquiry from a client outside their area. According to Italian Law, if a franchisor does not duly fulfill an exclusivity right of the franchisee, generally the latter has the right to terminate the franchise agreement, and to receive compensation for damages. Some franchise agreements in Italy do not have any territorial exclusivity, or very limited one. However, this does not mean that, even in the absence of exclusivity in favor of the franchisee, the franchisor is absolutely free to organize his network, to the detriment of the affiliate’s interests.

Index

1.Benefits of exclusive territories for franchisors and franchisees

It is common for franchisors to grant exclusive territories to franchisees.. Under an  exclusivity  clause, franchisors cannot enter into other franchise contracts within a certain area, described in the franchise agreement,  during the validity of the same agreement.

Most franchise networks operate on the basis of giving each franchisee their own exclusive territory. In fact, exclusivity can meet the interests of both the franchisor and the franchisees.

From a franchisor’s perspective, it avoids franchisees from the same network competing and potentially undercutting each other, which could devalue the franchise brand. Exclusivity is also functional to discouraging opportunistic behavior by franchisees, who – especially in the case where the fee is calculated through royalties as a percentage of turnover – could be induced to neglect the franchising activity by dedicating to similar and competitive activities.

On the other hand, franchisees are protected from competition from the franchisor or another franchisee within a defined area of operation. Therefore, exclusivity represents a significant incentive to contract for the franchisee, as it allows him not to suffer intra-brand competition of other affiliates or of the same franchisor in a certain territory or for certain sales channels, and gives him more guarantees to recover the investment costs in entering the franchise.

Offering exclusive territories to franchisees usually makes sense in the context of a franchise network. However, not all franchise businesses benefit from boundary restrictions. In fact, relationship-driven and referral-based businesses, such as professional services, may be negatively impacted by territory restrictions, as they often depend on the referrals that existing customers provide, and therefore a geographical boundary could hinder the success of the individual franchisees.

Ultimately, whether exclusivity is granted or not will depend on the type of product/service offering, the success of the franchised brand and whether it is particularly vulnerable to local competition.

2.Defining the exclusive area

An exclusive territory can be defined by a number of methods. The most common one is to define in the franchise agreement a certain radius from the franchisee’s location (POS); but also postal walks, postal codes, municipal limits and even natural boundaries can be used for such purpose. A territory can be also limited to one place, such as a shopping center.

The criteria to determine the optimum size of the exclusive are usually determined by demographic studies; but other factors can be taken into consideration, such as the effect caused by latent market demand – which increases the potential of the marketplace as consumer awareness of a particular product or service gains recognition – and the competitors’ presence in the market area.

Whatever the method, the franchise agreement should clearly define the exclusive territory. If not properly defined, it is possible for disputes to arise between franchisors and franchisees as to the precise extent of the territory.

3.Setting up protected territories

Choosing the size and location of each franchisee’ territory can be challenging. The size of any exclusive territory does not dictate the ultimate success of the franchisee’s unit; however, it should be big enough to allow the franchisee to obtain the maximum performance from his or her unit, but not so large that it will prevent the franchisor from obtaining optimum market share.

In fact, a franchise system can be damaged by awarding too many franchises in one area – or too few. If a protected area is too small, there may not be sufficient sales potential for franchisees to be successful. Conversely, if the area is too large, franchisees might not be able to fully exploit the territory, leaving potential sales untapped. Franchisees often misunderstand the rationale that applies to the size of a territory, and consequently insist on a territory that it too large which can be a detriment, rather than a benefit, to them.

Many franchise networks aim to keep each territory the same, for uniformity needs; however, although it may seem attractive to a franchisor to keep each territory the same size, careful consideration needs to be given to the demographics and local geography of a particular area to determine its sales potential.For example, the Italian territory is very different; an area within a three mile radius in a heavily populated town, such as Milan, Turin or Rome, is very different from an area of the same size in a country side of south Italy.

Getting the size and location of protected territories wrong can be a costly mistake for franchisors, since once an area has been allocated to a franchisee, there is little scope to change it, at least when the franchise agreement is in force. On the other hand, well performing franchisees are often given the option to extend their exclusivity in adjacent territories. However, franchisors could be hesitant about making such a commitment, as it could be premature for the franchisee to acquire a second franchise at the time the franchisor wishes to expand.

4.Limiting franchisees’ exclusivity

Quite often, franchise agreements  grant the franchisor a reserved right to distribute products through what is generally referred to as “alternative channels of distribution” within franchisees exclusive territory. This means that although the franchisor may be restricted from awarding another franchise, or operating a company owned within the franchisee’s territory, he has the right to sell in such territory the products through other channels, such as on-line, kiosks, food trucks, shopping centers, airports, hotels, stadiums, amusement parks etc. This may constitute a heavy limit for franchisee’s protected territory, which must be carefully taken into consideration when signing a franchise agreement.

Moreover, franchisors usually wish to retain some flexibility in awarding exclusive territories to franchisees, therefore providing for the right to modify the exclusivity clause during the franchise agreement. This happens basically in two directions.

First, many franchise agreements contain a  provision that allows franchisors to place additional units in the territory if certain events take place, such as if the population growth exceeds a certain figure or percentage over a specified period of time, or if market conditions change.

Second, franchisors have the interest to maintain enough control over the element of exclusivity to motivate their franchisees. For this reason, many franchisors require franchisees to maintain specific sales levels or meet various performance criteria to keep their exclusive rights to a territory.

In fact, there is the risk that exclusive territories are granted to franchisees who fail to fully develop the business in a given area, having a good potential. To limit this risk, franchise agreements often contain the right for the franchisor to withdraw exclusivity or change the boundaries of the territory if the franchisee either fails to achieve required performance targets or breaches the franchise agreement. This protects the franchisor against an under-performing franchisee or a franchisee that does not duly fulfill the franchise obligations.

From a franchisee perspective, the right to operate exclusively in a given area is a significant part of the franchise fee paid to the franchisor when they chose to join the franchise network.

Therefore,  the threat of withdrawal of exclusivity or changes to the territory protected often constitutes an effective incentive for franchisees and a good resort for franchisors to correct any problems.

5.Advertising, cross-border enquires and clients

Where a franchise network is built on exclusive territories, the franchisor should ensure that the franchise agreement contains provisions restricting franchisees from actively seeking customers outside their respective territories.

However, franchisees cannot be prevented from carrying out passive advertising, i.e., to promote their activity without specifically targeting customers in a particular area (as it usually happens with social media). Therefore, even where exclusivity is offered, it still may be diluted by passive advertising, so that franchisees are allowed to reach a prospective customer outside their exclusive territory.

Issues can arise when a franchisee receives an enquiry from a prospective customer outside of his exclusive territory. It is not always easy to deal with such an issue; for example, in case of networks that rely on customers travelling to the business (such as a fast-food outlet), it is very difficult to restrict use of franchisee’s outlets by customers.

In any case, franchisors should set up a regulation or a procedure to deal with cross-border enquiries, to avoid disputes arising between franchisees. Some franchise agreements state that outside clients must be passed to the local franchisee in the client’s area, either with or without compensation to the franchisee who received the original lead. Others allow the franchisee who received the enquiry to continue to serve the client even though they are outside the franchisees’ territory. Again, this may or may not involve paying compensation to the sitting franchisee in the client’s actual area.

Another challenge can arise when it comes to unsold territories. In such cases, a franchisee may be permitted to operate in unsold, neighbouring territories but the franchisor must have a pre-agreed process for what happens when the neighbouring territory is sold to a new franchisee. This will usually involve the original franchisee passing the relevant clients over to the new franchisee, either with or without compensation being paid.

The extent to which geographical issues arise is dependent on the nature of the business. For example, in the case of a network that provides services in the client’s home, it’s easy to establish which area a particular customer premises falls into. But complications arise when a client lives near the border between two territories. In that case, the client’s nearest franchisee may be the one in the neighbouring territory.

Networks that rely on customers travelling to the business may find it almost impossible to restrict which customers use which franchisee. For example, a client may live in one area and work in another. The franchise that they use could vary on each occasion depending on whether they are travelling from work or home. In these cases, exclusivity is usually limited to an agreement that the franchisor won’t allow any other franchisees to open business premises within the exclusive area.

6.Legal aspects of exclusivity clauses

What mentioned above does not mean that all franchise agreements in Italy contain an exclusivity clause. Although exclusivity is quite common, and it can be considered intimately intertwined in the economic function of franchise agreements, it usually does not constitute a natural element of the same.

In other terms, exclusivity is not automatically inserted in a franchise agreement; on the contrary,  it becomes part of the contractual regulation only if it is expressly provided for by the parties in the contract. This – distinguishes franchising from other similar agreements, such as distribution (agency) agreements, where the distributor must be given a certain exclusive territory to operate.

Therefore, in the absence of an express exclusivity clause, the franchisee cannot claim any rights in this sense, and there is no contractual liability on the part of the franchisor, should the latter make use of other distributors in the same territorial market in which the franchisee operates.

However, this does not mean that, even in the absence of exclusivity in favor of the franchisee, the franchisor can be considered absolutely free to organize his own distribution network, to the detriment of the affiliate’s interests.

In fact, if the franchisor, in the absence of a territorial exclusivity clause, adopts a sales policy providing for the opening of a sale point of another affiliate to very little distance from that of a pre-existing affiliate, thus compromising the interests of the latter, he is liable  for violation of the duties of correctness and contractual good faith. In other words, even in the absence of a territorial exclusivity in favor of the franchisees, the franchisor is obliged to preserve their interests, and to organize a distribution network in such a way as not to create unfair competition among the franchisees.

On the other hand, if an exclusive territory clause is contained in the franchise agreement and  a franchisor does not duly fulfill the exclusivity right  of the franchisee, generally the latter has the right to  terminate the franchise agreement, being it for the most part a serious breach of the contract.

Compensation for damages will also be due, in an amount equal to the lost earnings that may result to the franchisee from the violation of the exclusivity. The injured franchisee may also request an emergency measure aimed at inhibiting the violation of his exclusivity rights.

Avv. Valerio Pandolfini

 

For other in-depth articles on issues relating to franchising: visit our blog.


The information contained in this article is of a general nature and is not to be considered an exhaustive examination of the various issues, nor is it intended to express an opinion or provide legal advice. Specific legal advice must be provided with regard to individual cases.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://franchisinginitaly.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/exclusive-rights-in-italian-franchising-agreements.jpg 800 1200 Valerio Pandolfini https://franchisinginitaly.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/franchisinginitaly-pandolfini-logo.png Valerio Pandolfini2021-02-19 09:56:222022-10-07 09:23:36Franchising: defining exclusive territory rights

About the author

Avv. Valerio Pandolfini
CONTACT US

Latest posts

  • expanding franchise italy main features pros and cons why whenExpanding a franchise in Italy through Master franchising: a brief guide17 February 2023 - 09:09
  • franchising preliminary agreements letters of intent loiFranchising and preliminary agreements in Italy: the letters of intent (LOI) and option agreements30 November 2022 - 09:59
  • misleading advertising italy what are sanctions for franchisorsFranchising in Italy: the regulation of Mmisleading and comparative advertising: the sanctions for franchisors29 November 2022 - 10:05
  • duration franchise agreements in italyFranchise agreements in Italy: duration, renewal, withdrawal, termination29 November 2022 - 09:43
  • disclosure potential franchisees what provided italian law franchisingDisclosure to potential franchisees: what it is provided for by Italian Franchise Law29 November 2022 - 09:16

Search

Subscribe to our Newsletter

For further information and to schedule a first telephone interview or a non-binding fact-finding meeting, you can fill in the form to be contacted:

By phone:

+39 02 36 52 29 61

By mail:

info@studio-pandolfini.it

Or, filling out

the following form:

I authorize the data controller to use my personal data for sending communications relating to this contact request in accordance with the provisions of the privacy policy Privacy Policy

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

This contact form is deactivated because you refused to accept Google reCaptcha service which is necessary to validate any messages sent by the form.
Studio Legale Avvocato Pandolfini | VAT nr. 04848740967 | C.F. PNDVLR64M04D612F | Polizza Generali INA-Assitalia n. 764104068 | Polizza Elite Insurance n. 2015/R/130223
Mail: info@studio-pandolfini.it | Telefono: 02 36 52 29 61 | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Manage Consent | Realizzazione sito web: Alkimedia Web Agency Milano, Realizzazione siti web Milano
Franchising and e-commerce: can franchisors (legally) limit online sales and...how is franchising regulated italyfranchising increasing in ItalyFranchising confirms to be increasing in Italy
Scroll to top
We and selected third parties use cookies or similar technologies for technical purposes and, with your consent, for other purposes as specified in the Cookie Policy. You can freely give, deny, or withdraw your consent at any time by clicking "Manage Consent" at the bottom of the page. You can consent to the use of such technologies by using the “Accept All” button or deny and close the notice by using the "Reject All" button. Settings

Reject All Accept All
Manage Consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
_GRECAPTCHA5 months 27 daysThis cookie is set by the Google recaptcha service to identify bots to protect the website against malicious spam attacks.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category .
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
CookieLawInfoConsent1 yearRecords the default button state of the corresponding category & the status of CCPA. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie.
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThe _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
_gat_UA-154928096-61 minuteA variation of the _gat cookie set by Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager to allow website owners to track visitor behaviour and measure site performance. The pattern element in the name contains the unique identity number of the account or website it relates to.
_gid1 dayInstalled by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
Save & Accept